Can you redistribute body fat

Beef up your routine. Do 30 minutes of climbing on the Stairmaster, going at a slow, steady clip. Carry your weight on your feet and not on the handrails. Jon Williams. Jon Williams is a clinical psychologist and freelance writer. He has performed, presented and published research on a variety of psychological and physical health issues. A woman doing lunges while holding weights at the gym.

Video of the Day. Mind Work. Step 1. Step 2. Step 3. Step 4. Body Work. Step 5. Things You'll Need Bar Dumbbells.

The views expressed in Ask a Surgeon and the Patient Community are those of the participants and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Share your journey with other people just like you on the Patient Community or post your question to Ask a Surgeon to get an authoritative and trustworthy answer from our ASPS member surgeons.

Share your journey with other people just like you on the Patient Community. My Account. News Blog Can fat return after liposuction? It is important to note that liposuction does indeed permanently remove fat cells from the body. Can fat return? Maintenance tips: How to keep your liposuction results The most effective way to sustain the results of any liposuction procedure over the long-term is to maintain your ideal weight.

Here are 6 healthy lifestyle changes to adopt following your procedure: Follow all post-procedure instructions provided by your surgeon. Reduce caloric intake while eating a healthy diet focused on protein and healthy carbohydrates. Stay properly hydrated by drinking lots of water.

Try eating several smaller meals throughout the day. Never skip meals. But despite this ill-informed advice can you actually change in any small way where you store fat on your body? With diet and exercise, you can drastically reduce the amount of body fat you have overall rendering your fat distribution shape almost pointless , and with some targeted weight training, you can increase the size of your muscles to change your overall silhouette.

Okay, so by now you know that the way we store fat on our bodies is largely determined by the genetics and hormones passed onto us from our parents — and that's fine, because it's possible to change your body's overall shape through minimising body fat and weight training.

But one thing few people realise is that our body actually stores more than one type of fat. Visceral fat is strongly linked with disease and should be specially targeted. Thankfully, that old chestnut of eating healthily and exercising more is the most powerful way to fit the fat that collects around your midsection — but it pays to watch your stress levels, too.

Clinical characteristics of patients with anorexia nervosa AN before and immediately after weight gain and of healthy control subjects. P value determined by independent-sample t test comparisons. After normalization of weight, the WHR of patients 0.

The mean percentage of body fat of patients with AN at low weight 9. At low weight, trunk fat as a percentage of total fat in patients With weight gain, trunk fat as a percentage of total fat increased significantly The percentage of trunk fat Measures of body composition assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry DXA and magnetic resonance imaging MRI in patients with anorexia nervosa AN before and immediately after weight gain and in healthy control subjects 1.

After weight normalization, mean TAT and SM masses were not significantly different between patients and control subjects. Results from hormonal analyses conducted on all morning blood samples 29 patients, 15 control subjects and the subset of fasting blood samples 22 patients, 5 control subjects were not significantly different.

Thus, results from the larger sample are presented. Morning serum hormone concentrations in patients with anorexia nervosa AN before and immediately after weight gain. Despite normalization of weight, the average serum cortisol concentration of the patients did not change and remained higher than that of control subjects. Serum estradiol concentrations, however, increased with weight gain but remained below control concentrations.

In addition to one subject who had regular menses despite low weight, 5 additional subjects resumed menstruating with weight normalization. Mean serum testosterone concentration was unchanged with weight gain. For the patient group only, we fit a series of regression models to assess the relation between VAT after weight normalization, hormone concentrations before and after weight normalization, and initial VAT. The present study found that, immediately after weight restoration to a normal weight, women with AN have an adipose tissue distribution that differs significantly from healthy control subjects.

These findings were consistently observed with several different methods that all suggested disproportionate central adipose tissue deposition with weight recovery: elevated WHR, total trunk fat, and VAT. In addition, the adipose tissue interspersed between muscle fibers, IMAT, was also significantly greater in weight-recovered patients with AN than in control subjects.

Forbes 16 was the first to examine body fat distribution in a cross-section of underweight women with AN. Our results replicate this first examination of body fat distribution in patients with AN.

Our results are generally consistent with and extend previous reports that document a central adiposity phenotype in weight-recovered patients with AN 5 — 8 , 17 , All reported, as expected, that at low weight patients had reduced body fat mass that increased with weight gain.

Grinspoon et al 7 extended the findings of Iketani et al 6 by measuring not only absolute fat mass but also by analyzing the relative proportions of fat in the trunk compared with the extremities before and after weight gain. At baseline, trunk fat as a percentage of total fat was not statistically different between the patient and control groups.

With weight gain, however, trunk fat as a percentage of total fat increased but the percentage of extremity fat did not, thus supporting a relative truncal obesity in refed women with AN.

A limitation of the study of Grinspoon et al 7 , overcome in the present study, is that patients were still underweight at the end of the trial, leaving uncertain the effect of more complete weight restoration on body fat distribution. Our study confirms the findings of Grinspoon et al 7 and extends them to a population with more complete weight restoration.

In the current study, total body VAT as a percentage of total body adipose tissue, assessed by multiple-slice MRI, was also higher in low-weight patients 5.

Zamboni et al 18 , using single-slice CT at the L4—L5 level, replicated and extended the findings of Mayo-Smith et al 17 by reporting that with a mean 7. They, too, concluded that patients with AN gain abdominal fat but were unable to address whether there is a distinct preference to deposit weight centrally because they did not measure adipose tissue in other regions eg, the extremities.

The patients in the study of Zamboni et al 18 also had incomplete weight restoration at the time of retesting BMI: With the use of total-body MRI and with more complete weight normalization a mean weight gain of At baseline we observed the classic hormone pattern observed in patients with AN 19 — With recovery, serum cortisol concentrations remained elevated and estrogen concentrations remained low. Serum testosterone concentrations in patients did not differ from those in control subjects either at baseline or with recovery.

Grinspoon et al 7 reported a strong association between change in percentage of trunk fat and baseline h urinary-free cortisol, as well as end-of-study cortisol and increase in trunk fat. We found that serum cortisol at low weight and testosterone after weight gain were significant predictors of postweight gain VAT.

The full implication of an association between testosterone concentrations and VAT is unclear. Because of likely changing sex hormone-binding globulin concentrations, total serum testosterone may not accurately reflect free testosterone concentrations. Similarly, we confirm the finding of Grinspoon et al 7 of an absence of significant relation between estradiol and body fat distribution in the AN population.

However, because only a small number of patients resumed regular cycling with weight gain, additional work is necessary to exclude an effect of estradiol on fat accumulation. It is unknown whether the tendency to accumulate abdominal fat, particularly VAT, during acute weight recovery has a significant negative psychological effect.

It is conceivable that those who gain the most trunk fat and VAT are also the most distressed about their body shape and, thus, more prone to relapse.

If this disproportionate abdominal fat is an acute effect of weight gain and redistributes with long-term maintenance of normal weight, supportive therapy might suffice to help the patient tolerate the body distortions until redistribution. Alternately, if the changes are more permanently induced, a more targeted, cognitive approach might be necessary to promote self-acceptance. The implications of increased VAT in this population of young women deserve further exploration.

Although increased VAT has been associated with the metabolic syndrome in other disorders 22 , there are no definitive studies in AN of other features of metabolic syndrome eg, insulin resistance, activated inflammatory pathways. Similarly, although VAT has been implicated as a significant risk factor for cardiovascular disease 23 , few studies have examined long-term increased rates of morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular disease in this population There are several limitations to this study.

Whether a slower rate of weight gain would be associated with a more normal distribution of body fat is uncertain. However, in the study of Grinspoon et al 7 a smaller weight gain over 9 mo was also associated with a greater increase in truncal fat than in extremity fat.

Thus, the effect of rate of weight gain on body fat distribution is an area for further study. Additionally, the subjects in the current study had maintained normal weight for a relatively short duration.

Whether body fat distribution would further equilibrate and become more normal with persistent weight maintenance is an important unanswered question. A study by Wentz et al 25 , that compared the bone density and body composition of women and men with AN 11 y after onset of illness some of whom still carried the diagnosis with that of normal, healthy control subjects found significant differences between the groups.

Percentages of body fat and body fat distribution were both significantly different between the groups: patients with AN had reduced percentage of body fat despite similar BMI compared with control subjects, but control subjects had higher trunk fat-to-extremity fat ratio.